Dear  Editor:
A lack of  coordinated accounting practices at the Royal City Education Foundation resulted  in significant funding losses for the Richard McBride school parent advisory  council, as reported by past parents' advisory council co-chair and bursary  committee chair, Judy French (Bursary fund troubles, Letters to the editor, The  Record, March 19).
Since that  accounting fiasco, the F.W. Howay parents' advisory council (PAC) received a  letter soliciting payment for Royal City Education Foundation bursary funds that  had already been paid and might have been paid twice except for the fact that  the PAC was able to produce foundation-issued receipts as proof of  payment.
It is interesting that school board  chair Michael Ewen, in his recent letter to the editor (District must guard  privacy, Letters to the editor, The Record, March 26) failed to comment on  these, and other related PAC/education foundation  issues.
More  importantly, his account of the district's difficulty involving the Privacy Act  is incomplete because he neglects to mention how the issue originated: based on  a random government audit of the Howay PAC, inquiries were made about  scholarship/bursary donations to the Royal City Education  Foundation.
The intent  of asking the audit-related questions was to track our donated dollars, not the  students whose names were previously announced at an open, public  ceremony.
In an  e-mail response dated Feb. 5, in lieu of answers, Mr. Ewen stated that the Royal  City Education Foundation was "an independent organization under the Societies  Act" and informed the PAC that answers would be provided to them after legal  counsel determined if the questions violated the Privacy  Act.
Mr. Ewen's  evasive course of action, used to distract focus from the real issue of  education foundation accountability, raised more red flags with both the Howay  PAC and the government auditors.
The fact  is, not one of the Howay PAC questions required the release of a student name,  and so at no time was any individual's privacy ever in  jeopardy.
Further, it  is unlikely that any student receiving PAC money to assist with their  post-secondary tuition would consider the PAC to be a  threat.
Mr. Ewen's  response reflected poorly on himself and on the Royal City Education  Foundation.
Moreover,  by raising the Privacy Act controversy at a public school board meeting, he  created a public issue where none existed.
Despite  Ewen's unwarranted roadblock, the Howay PAC remains resolute to achieve  compliance with the audit findings and is currently awaiting confirmation from  the education foundation chair, trustee Ron Bennett, that unclaimed Howay monies  will be returned from the education foundation to Howay PAC  coffers.
Paul Johansen, PAC president, F.W. Howay
 
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
2 comments:
Thank You for exposing these people for what they really are! I smell fish!
Paul Johansen have you ever considered running for trustee we need more honest people like you in positions of trust.
Post a Comment