Wednesday, December 31, 2008

All the best in 2009

To all our friends, members and supporters,

We wish you all the best in 2009 and we thank you for your support throughout the past year.

Voice New Westminster

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Special Open School Board Meeting

As part of its school site selection process the Board of Education for School District No. 40 (New Westminster) will be holding a Special Open Board Meeting to address its School Consolidation and/or Closure Policy and grade configuration.

Tuesday, January 6, 2009 at 7:00 pm

City Hall – Council Chambers

SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 40 (NEW WESTMINSTER)

An Important Notice for Residents of New Westminster

The Board of Education for School District No. 40 (New Westminster) invites you to participate in two sequential Community Workshops to provide input for the selection of school sites.

Community Workshops are scheduled for the following dates:

Wednesday, January 14, 2009: 6:00 pm – 9:30 pm

Saturday, January 17, 2009: 10:00 am – 2:30 pm

The preferred option(s) will be presented at an Open House at a date to be confirmed following the workshops.

All events will be held at Century House, 620 Eighth Street, New Westminster.

PRE-REGISTRATION IS REQUESTED

Please Contact: Barb Basden @ 604-517-6310 or bbasden@sd40.bc.ca

Friday, December 19, 2008

Interesting Articles in the Sun Regarding Enforcement of Municipal Election Regulations

Daphne Bramham has an item in the Sun today about a complaint laid against two BC cabinets ministers who endorsed municipal candidates. It is a follow up to an article a few days ago.

Friday, December 5, 2008

Santa Shops Sapperton

This Saturday, December 6th, from noon - 4pm, and Thursday, December 11th from 6-9pm visit downtown Sapperton, E. Columbia Street for family fun.
There will be festive roasted chestnuts, Cal's Christmas Karaoke, a Christmas tree sale by WesGroup Properties, a special appearance by Santa, gift basket draws, as well as special Sapperton promotions and passport shopping.
It promises to be a fun family time.

- Neil Powell

Wednesday, December 3, 2008

What's the Big Deal about the Influence of the DLC in Our Local Municipal Election

For all those who have been wondering what the big deal is about the influence of the DLC in our local municipal election, here is a fine example of what you can get with that sort of "support".
If you read Vaughn Palmer you will know why Voice New Westminster was formed. In short, it was formed to put the community first in all matters.

The NDP and unions as political bedfellows: Veteran insider tells all
By Vaughn PalmerDecember 3, 2008

The B.C. New Democratic Party's relationship with organized labour is under examination in court this month, thanks to some telling testimony from a long-time denizen of NDP campaigns.
The case involves the challenge to the election "gag law," the B.C. Liberal attempt to rein in advertising by unions and other third parties in the run-up to provincial elections.
In the effort to provide a rationale for the law, its defenders sought and obtained an affidavit from Brad Zubyk.
He's a 20-year veteran of B.C. political campaigns, mostly on behalf of left-of-centre parties.
Zubyk helped former NDP MLA Gregor Robertson win the mayor's office in this fall. He also worked for the B.C. branch of the federal Liberals in their campaign.
But the relevant parts of his resume for this case were his multiple efforts for the NDP, including the last provincial campaign.
"During the 2005 election, I was one of the senior people in the communications campaign run by the provincial NDP," Zubyk says in his affidavit. My official title was director of candidate support. This made me one of the core communications operatives in the NDP's campaign war room.
"During that time," continues the voice from the NDP war room, "the NDP ran an election campaign that was closely coordinated with the campaigns of major labour groups in the province.
"The unions' membership and spending was used as a resource to support our overall campaign and we exploited that resource to the best effect possible.
"The degree to which the unions put their resources at our disposal varied from union to union; however, the vast majority were supportive in some fashion."
He singles out the B.C. Federation of Labour, the Hospital Employees' , the Canadian Union of Public Employees and the Canadian Office and Professional Employees.
The veteran backroom boy cited the myriad ways unions had worked hand in hand with the NDP, from coordinating "events and rallies" to placing anti-government advertising.
"The NDP would be advised of the advertising being run by the unions so that duplication of effort could be avoided," according to Zubyk. "This process was informal but constant. Because of the heavy advertising conducted by unions in support of the NDP in 2005, we were able to devote more of the NDP's own money to other campaign activities."
Heavy is right. A half-dozen unions spent almost $3 million on anti-government advertising in the three months leading up to the election.
Zubyk also told how the unions would tap their own membership lists "on behalf of and in coordination with the NDP."
They aimed to mobilize their members as campaign volunteers, but also as potential NDP voters.
He described how the unions telephoned their members early in the campaign in an effort to identify their political leanings.
Zubyk: "I know that unions came to know the political preferences of the members they called because that was the very purpose of the initial stages of the election calling campaign."
He also says: "One of the things that some major unions would do for the NDP during this campaign was to share contact information of their members with the party."
This quasi-merger of the lists would "permit more accurate and efficient use of voter identification resources and permit those [union] members to be targeted with messaging supportive of the NDP and designed to ensure that members supportive of the NDP vote on election day."
All this coordinated effort -- events, advertising, volunteer recruitment and voter identification -- amounted to parallel campaigns, one run by the unions, the other directly by the NDP.
"The NDP expected this coordination to permit the party's own resources to be freed up for investment in other campaign activities," Zubyk says.
"It was effectively the pooling of resources (financial and human) to serve the end of electing as many NDP candidates as possible."
He goes on to discuss the implications for public awareness of the role played by the unions.
"This represented a substantial benefit to the NDP without the unions ever having to make a formal donation to the party," Zubyk observes.
Preferable, he goes on to suggest, because formal donations "would have to be reported and would become known to the unions' members as a discrete figure."
Some union members who are not devout NDP supporters might even take exception to the size of donations.
But the main advantage was to lower the public profile of labour's assistance to the NDP.
Zubyk's testimony in this complicated case in B.C. Supreme Court won't surprise anyone who has followed the labour-NDP link closely over the years.
But the details do help illustrate why the Liberals moved to curb third-party advertising, while rejecting all calls to end their own heavy reliance on financial support from business and corporate interests.
vpalmer@direct.ca

Friday, November 28, 2008

Brent Atkinson by a whisker

This just in from Doris Fassbender, the Deputy Chief Election Officer for the City of New Westminster:

Following a two day judicial recount at the BC Provincial Court, New Westminster Registry, Judge Her Honour Alexander declared the results for the office of School Trustee for the 2008 General Local Election for the City of New Westminster. Brent Atkinson received 3665 votes and Vivian Garcia received 3663 votes. Therefore, Brent Atkinson was declared School Trustee-elect.

Sunday, November 23, 2008

Grimston Park - a much larger issue

A whole new generation of New Westminster parents seem to be waking up to the morbidly dysfunctional monolith that calls itself the New Westminster School Board. At issue is the lack of transparency and public process in the decision-making process around the Grimston park proposals (aka “business as usual” in SD #40).

Following the recent civic election, in which voter apathy was once again the ultimate victor, West End parent Cynthia Smith sent an email to Superintendent John Woudzia regarding the Grimston Park issue. In response, Smith received an email from District Labour Council school trustee James Janzen that she clearly found very insulting.

Here is a bit of the email exchange that took place between Cynthia Smith and James Janzen:

1. Cynthia Smith’s email to Superintendent John Woudzia:

Date: November 20, 2008 9:12:05 AM PST
Subject: Grimston Park - a much larger issue

At some point those who represent us must realize that unilateral decisions made behind closed doors and affecting so many are not acceptable - the Grimston Park issue is cited on A4 of the Vancouver Sun today and you may expect the community to watch closely and follow-up.

http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/news/westcoastnews/story.html?id=3D25c3e

Cynthia Smith


2. James Janzen’s response to Cynthia Smith:

Subject: Re: Grimston Park - a much larger issue (E-mail from School District #40)
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:19:51 -0800

Cynthia Smith

the report in the Vancouver Sun was of course wrong as so many newspaper reports are. The only decision made was to take the Grimston Park option out for consultation. Anybody who says otherwise is lying. Unfortunately many people prefer to listen to lies, rumours and gossip and will not listen to the truth.

James Janzen


3. Cynthia Smith’s response to James Janzen:

James Janzen,

Your memory of the October 28th, 2008 meeting appears to differ from mine.

Here is the point of difference: Mr Alkins announced that the municipality, the province and the school district had agreed to the land swap between Grimston Park and the old Douglas Rd cemetery site. Mr. Alkins said that he was presenting those in attendance with the choice between a middle school somewhere on Grimston park land, and an elementary school somewhere on Grimston park land. He had current quotes for building, and all that remained was for the school size "option" to be decided. He concluded by saying that he wanted the contractors in place by November 2008 (in other words, right now).

James Janzen, I have spent more than 8 years in post graduate study, in such places as the Smithsonian and the Library of Congress - are you saying to me that I did not understand the presentation that I attended on October 28, 2008 at Lord
Tweedsmuir elementary school in New Westminster, BC?

If you suggest that I shouldn't have believed the presentation, then why was it held at all? What should one believe given the presentation on Oct 28, and the information on the Translink web site? You repeatedly tell me not to believe what I hear. Of course, you must realize that that would include what you are telling me as well.

Cynthia Smith


Our hats are off to Cynthia Smith and the new generation of New Westminster parents who have now been initiated into the shadowy workings of the New Westminster school district. Only time will tell if this new generation can sound the death knell for voter apathy in New Westminster. Stay tuned…

Saturday, November 22, 2008

2010 Reason to Celebrate in New Westminster

VOICE New Westminster Council Candidate Betty McIntosh spoke often at the all-candidate's meetings about celebrating New Westminster in 2009, well it looks like we'll have something else to celebrate about in 2010 as well. The 2010 Olympic Torch Relay will be in New Westminster on February 9th, 2010. The City is one of 200 Canadian cities to host a celebration.

The VANOC press release is here and details on how to become a torchbearer can be found here.

Westside Middle School: Alternative Options as Identified by Community Members

Here are the options community members came up with at the public information sessions the SD held on November 4th.

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Politicians make too many decisions in secret!

New Westminster gets mentioned in this article in today's Sun.
"Last month, behind closed doors, New Westminster city officials discussed building a school at Grimston Park, a move opposed by many residents who don't want to lose green space. Residents found out about the plans only two weeks later and then organized a rally to keep the park.

Citizens have a right to protest. But they can't do so when officials withhold the very information that would lead residents to rally."

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

SD 40 Releases Summary Report on Douglas Road Cemetery

SD40 has finally released the infamous Wolf Report that, although never before released, is supposedly the city's worst-kept secret. At one of the recent consulation meetings MLA Puchmayr stated that there were copies all over the city. Well, now you get to see it for yourself.

Monday, November 17, 2008

Letter of Congratulations and Thanks from Blair Armitage

I would like to congratulate Wayne Wright on being elected to a third term as Mayor of New Westminster. To be elected to three consecutive terms after vigorous campaigns is not an easy task and he deserves recognition for this accomplishment.

I would also want to thank the 4,238 citizens of New Westminster for having supported me in this election and my ideas for change in this City. I am humbled that nearly half of the voters of this City endorsed my candidacy. Many, many thanks for your confidence.

Let me assure you that I will continue to advocate on your behalf. I will continue to speak out for the wonderful neighbourhoods of this great city. I will continue to advocate for consultation and consensus. And I will most definitely continue to advocate for improved public process so that the citizens of New Westminster will have their voices heard.

Yours truly,

Blair Armitage

Saturday, November 15, 2008

Let the sun shine in -- Vote for VOICE

For those of you who are visiting this site and have yet to vote, consider what has transpired in the last four days of campaigning here in New Westminster.

· There has been an absolute orgy of advertising in both local papers by the District Labour Council slate: Ads paid for by the sweat and labour and of their members. Check it out! It’s disgusting because the Labour Council continues to mislead the public about the existence of the Labour Council slate.

· The Mayor takes out full page ads in both local papers warning everybody about the evils of slates, and of Voice in particular. Meanwhile on the same day New Westminster residents receive envelopes showing that the Mayor is involved with two slates in an attempt to control the outcome of city council composition. It is the height of hypocrisy!

· A well known school trustee gets his son-in-law to write a letter to the Record singing the praises of his father-in-law. The writer doesn't identify himself. It’s an act of desperation.

· The Mayor and a few school trustees have been telling the electorate that the money for the new schools is off the table if the Grimston Park option is not acted upon. Talk about spreading false information and being a tad economical with the truth. It’s plain old fear politics.


VOTE FOR CHANGE - STOP THE BACK ROOM DEALING.

LET THE SUN SHINE IN - VOTE FOR VOICE.

Friday, November 14, 2008

Letter Received by School Board and City Council Candidates

"While the Royal City Record chose not to print the attached letter to the editor in today's edition, along with many others it apparently continued to receive on the subject of using Grimston Park for school purposes, I wanted to share it with you, Mr. Ewen, with other candidates seeking office either on the School Board or City Council (having email addresses I could find), and with our MLA.

Rick Scobie"

The unpublished letter follows below.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 11:48 PM
To: 'editorial@royalcityrecord.com'
Subject: Michael Ewen Lacking Education

School Board Trustee and Board Chair Michael Ewen in his letter to the Editor (November 8th edition, "Board chair defends process") laments the lack of sufficient lands for the required school needs in New Westminster and states: "Now I recognize that this is not an ideal solution, and the city would need to come to the table with cash and support the school and the community in resolving this option [of two schools on the Tweedsmuir site]". What this illustrates is a profound ignorance of the fact that schools, like hospitals, are NOT the responsibility of this City or any municipality. They are the responsibility of the Province.

Municipalities and cities have a bevy of responsibilities in providing local services to their local residents, businesses and industries. These include police and fire protection, roads, water distribution and sewer collection infrastructure, garbage collection, parks and recreation facilities, libraries, planning services, building permit and inspection services, arts and cultural facilities/services, etcetera. Municipalities and cities choose to provide these services to the extent their electorate is prepared to pay for them, noting their potential for generating the required revenue is largely confined to property taxes. Many municipalities and cities have long complained to the Provincial Government that this limited means of paying for local services is inadequate and not necessarily the most equitable, particularly when compared to the various means available to the Provincial Government for generating revenue for its services (i.e., income tax, sales tax, royalties and other license fees).

The provision of schools and hospitals has not been a municipal/city responsibility for many decades, primarily because the Province saw a compelling need to provide a standard level of these services to all people in the Province. Property owners see a separate "school tax" on their yearly property tax notice but this is collected with your municipal/city taxes only for convenience, as are taxes to support the B.C. Assessment Authority and several other agencies. Schools are not a municipal/city responsibility but a responsibility of the Provincial Government Ministry of Education, with assistance from local School Boards. Mr. Ewen is totally off base in suggesting that the City of New Westminster has any responsibility to provide cash or land (e.g., park land) to relieve the School Board and Ministry of Education of their responsibility to adequately address the educational facility deficit in our City. The City is already lacking in its planning for acquisition of future park space to serve neighbourhoods like the West End that will see population increases in future years. Mr. Ewen needs to go back to school and learn about jurisdictional responsibilities.

Unlike many municipalities and cities now facing declining school enrollments and the difficult decisions regarding school closures, New Westminster is facing continued increases in school aged children and projecting this will continue for several years. Anticipating the future school aged population - whether declining, holding steady or increasing - is not easy, as neither the local School Board or Ministry of Education can readily predict how demographics will change year-to-year. However, that is their challenge. Municipalities and cities have their own challenges in providing the diverse services they are responsible for. To look to a municipality or city to help bail out a local School Board and the Ministry of Education for their failure to adequately plan for the future and provide the required school facilities represents another example of Provincial down-loading that should be resisted at all cost. There are already too many problems being faced by municipalities and cities, such as homelessness, as a consequence of our Provincial Government's failure to fulfill its obligations, favouring instead to cut taxes to appease those who believe less government is better government.

Mr. Ewen should be directing his attention to our Minister of Education in Victoria, not to our City Council in New Westminster.

Rick Scobie
New Westminster

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Betty McIntosh's recent letter to the editor - the uncensored version

How could the City (Mayor Wayne Wright and City Administrator Paul Daminato as Task Force Members with the School District Representatives) put Grimston Park as the only option for a school site? This statement was made by Trustee Janzen at the all candidates meeting Nov. 03/08. They had no direction from City Council to place Grimston Park on the chopping block. As a City Councillor for the past 3 years I am totally dismayed that was the only option put forward. School Board members such as M. Ewen have not planned for the future. He's been there 28 years and in the past he attempted to close Hume Park School and now wants to use a Park for a school site. He has shown no vision over those 28 years wanting to close a school and use parks for schools such as Moody Park in the past.
It's fortunate this issue has come to the public prior to November 15th so the public can vote their opinion at the ballot box.
I will not vote in favour of a land swap Grimston Park for any school site.
Monday November 03/08 a motion to have Public Delegation was defeated as the Mayor cast the deciding opposing vote. The motion was moved by Councillor Bob Osterman, second by Councillor Betty McIntosh. Why does the Mayor fear public input at this time? What was the haste to conclude the meeting? Has democracy ceased in New Westminster?
The voters of New Westminster will decide the answers to these questions.

Betty McIntosh
604 619 8455

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Unpublished letter to the Editor, sent to The Record, Nov. 2, 2008

Which is it, Mr. Mayor?

In the spring when Metro Vancouver began expropriating the Canfor Lands Mayor Wayne Wright told the public that Ms. Spitale’s visit to incinerators in England and Councilor Harper’s visit to Japanese incinerators were just coincidental and happened to be at the same time as family holidays. Many of us found that just a little too convenient and coincidental but we had to take the mayor at his word. However at the Downtown Business Improvement Association’s All-Candidate’s meeting the mayor told the audience that once he’d heard about Metro Vancouver’s expropriation of the Canfor lands for the sake of an incinerator he sent these two people on fact finding missions. I wonder which version the mayor would have us believe.

Neil Powell
Voice New Westminster Candidate for City Council

Monday, November 10, 2008

Unpublished Letter, sent to the Royal City Record, November 2nd, 2008

Re: Enough with the nitpicking

Mr. Brett is a successful entrepreneur who has worked in private and public companies. I also work with entrepreneurs in private and public companies and I salute entrepreneurship. Good entrepreneurs have vision, skill and a deep understanding of their business, their market and their customers. These are the keys to success. This is especially critical when starting a business in China. That being said, when the Business Company was launched I do not think citizens saw this as venture capital which is usually high risk. The Directors of the company did promised huge returns in just a short time.

The seven Voice New Westminster School Trustee candidates are committed to providing New Westminster citizens with a full, open and objective accounting of the business company including objective analysis of the potential for profitability and what is needed to get there. Do we have the keys to success? The public will be asked to review the data, provide comment and their thoughts on the future of the company. I would be delighted if this process indicated that School District Business Company could begin to return funds to the classrooms. If the voters give me the opportunity, I would ask Mr. Brett if he would be willing to help.

Jim Goring, Voice New Westminster Candidate for School Trustee. 604-525-3975

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Unpublished letter sent to the Record editor, October 28th, 2008

I wish to clear up a misprint that was in the October 25th, Record, "Candidates look for votes". At the [then] recent Queensborough All-Candidate’s meeting I did not say that I had sat on a community policing committee for almost a decade. What I did say was that I was a founding director of the New Westminster Police Service’s Community Policing Committee and had been a director for a number of years following. I, along with my wife, Elizabeth, also volunteered for a number of years with the New Westminster Police Service’s Citizen’s Crime Watch. Through volunteering with these two community services I have become well aware of the need for a permanent police presence in Queensborough.
At last Tuesday’s meeting I also mentioned that Mayor Wright has been promising a permanent police presence in Queensborough since as early as October 2005, stating that it would be in place by 2006. I would like to reiterate that this needs to be a budget priority. The relocation of the casino to Queensborough increases this need and also provides a revenue generator to make this to happen.

- Neil Powell
Voice New Westminster Candidate for Council

Thursday, November 6, 2008

VOICE on Grimston Park

Community reaction to the plans announced last week to place a middle school or elementary school on Grimston Park has been immediate and understandable. Not surprisingly, with a civic election going on, VOICE New Westminster’s school trustee candidates have been asked what their position is on Grimston Park.

The VOICE school trustee candidates have been listening to all of the viewpoints being expressed in our community and have already spent a considerable amount of time discussing the subject together.

Quite simply, a VOICE New Westminster school board would never have put the Grimston Park proposal on the table in the first place. The options for Grimston Park were put on the table without due process as part of a back room deal between the city and the school board. All VOICE school trustee candidates believe that “options” should flow from public consultation and not the other way around as has been the case with the Grimston Park proposal.

The VOICE school trustee candidates feel that presenting the public with a single site option was, in fact, not an option at all. We know that there are other viable options that have not been brought forward and this was publicly acknowledged at the meeting held in the NWSS library on Tuesday, November 4th.

Like our fellow New Westminster residents, the VOICE school trustee candidates want all options brought forward and pursued with expedience, in open consultation and with full information being provided to the public for their consideration.

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Grimston Park and the School "Options" - Update

The News Leader is reporting that Grimston Park has been "taken off the table. This should change the nature of tonight's meeting at the New Westminster Secondary Library. The School Board's PowerPoint presentation and storyboards can be viewed through this site. The response forms can be found by clicking here.

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Take a look at some of our candidate's personal websites

A few of our candidates have created their own websites to enable you to learn a little more about them. Take a look for yourself.
Casey Cook
Betty McIntosh
Neil Powell

Friday, October 24, 2008

School Board to have meetings regarding former NW cemetery and location of middle school

The school board will be holding two meetings just before the November civic election.
The first meeting will let residents know the history (recent and long-term) of the former New Westminster Cemetery. The first meeting will be held tomorrow, Saturday, October 23rd. The following Saturday, November 1st, there will be a meeting regarding a location for the much awaited West end middle school.
Click here to learn more.

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Public has right to ask questions

Lisa Graham had the following letter published in the October 22nd Royal City Record.

Dear Editor:

The school board is all about community and community issues. It is entirely reasonable for the public to scrutinize the decisions that are made at the board table and, further, to raise questions on issues of concern, and this should happen without the consequence of being publicly rebuked by trustees.

Jim Goring's astute questioning of the School District No. 40 business company finances is reminiscent of parent Kelvin Chao's questions, which indicates that he is both informed and concerned; and, as a declared trustee candidate, he is only doing his homework.

On the issue of the business company audit, it needs to be acknowledged that the audit was done by a reputable firm, Grant and Thornton, and that the audit is legal and accurate. That being said, an audit is only a snapshot of the state of a company's finances, as presented, on the date of review. Further, it is not uncommon to do a comprehensive post-audit analysis of a company in order to clarify anomalies and/or assess the 'big-picture' status of any said company.

What Mr. Goring presented was a big-picture analysis of the school district business company's financial performance over the last couple of years, the result being that, compared to the losses accrued in the first four years of operation, over the last two years, the company has shown consecutive, but extremely modest, profits of $1,900 and $4,500.

That being clarified, of concern to myself as a "shareholder" is the fact that absolutely no monies from the company have been deposited into district coffers to benefit New Westminster students and staff - not in the form of any declared dividends and certainly not in the form of any repayment of the public education dollars that were used to start the company. Further, when I asked at the annual general meeting, I was told that the company directors had no current plans to address the loan.

If the school district business company is to continue, and it seems that it is the will of this board that it does continue, in terms of paying off the $1-million debt it owes to the district, I have long advocated that the business company recognize the loan for what it is: a legitimate business expense that is no different than any other business expense like salaries and lease costs, etc.

Currently, the business company's debt is not calculated into its annual audit, but when I raise the issue of establishing a repayment schedule for the loan, a majority of my trustee colleagues defeat it.

Unfortunately, the school district has more "need" than it has "budget," which is why, until it is paid in full, payment on the loan from the district should be a standing budget-item on the business company's ledger.

No longer can the school district afford to be treated like the bank of Mom and Dad.

Lisa Graham, New Westminster school trustee, Voice New Westminster

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Grand Opening of Voice Campaign Office

Please join us for the Grand Opening of our Voice New Westminster Campaign Office

When: 2:00 to 4:00 pm, Saturday October 18th
Where: #101 - 532 Sixth Street

* * * Refreshments will be served * * *

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

Jim Goring Questions Biz Company Numbers

Voice trustee hopeful says company's profit wasn't as large as it appeared

A Voice New Westminster board of education candidate says the school district's business company didn't actually make the $36,000 profit last year that's been reported, and it should have been clarified in the company's financial statements.

The district's profit appeared larger than it was last year because the district gained back money it had lost the previous year, said Jim Goring.

"(The business company) is still the same break-even company that it was. To say that we may have turned a corner this year - we're still not there, and whether or not we can remains to be seen," Goring said.

After reviewing the statements with a friend, who's a chartered accountant and business analyst, Goring said they determined that a bad debt expense in 2007 was conservatively estimated at a higher cost than it actually was and the money was recovered in 2008. That, along with refunded insurance costs, make the company's gains appear larger than they actually were.

According to Goring, in 2006/07 the district's 2006/07 loss of $30,216 is actually a profit of $1,914, making the 2007/08 profit not $36,000 but only $4,519.

The financial statements provide the wrong impression, said Goring.

Goring acknowledged the amount of time trustee Brent Atkinson, who is CEO of the business company which oversees a school in China, has put into the endeavour. He conceded that in the last two years - under Atkinson's guidance - the company hasn't lost money.

The business company has required working capital from the school district, and this shows that it is not able to stand on its own, Goring wrote in a release he gave The Record.

"I think the public needs to understand the real numbers," said Goring, who was announced as a Voice candidate last month.

Voice members call their group an "electors'group" and not a political organization, yet many of the members share the same perspective on city and school district matters.

The business company has long been under scrutiny from a number of Voice members, and some unaffiliated parents, who say it pulls money and time out of local schools. The for-profit company oversees the Wenzhou Offshore School in China and offers English as a second language programs abroad.

The district has invested $1 million into the company - the only one of its kind in the province.

Spurred on by the economic success of international education, the district launched the company after B.C. Liberal-introduced legislation allowed school districts to go into business.

Atkinson, who co-owns a successful chain of insurance companies, has narrowed the business company's focus and cut spending since he took over the operation.

Responding to Goring's claims, Atkinson said the business company's financial statements follow the auditor's standard of practice, and he has no say on how they should be done.

Atkinsons wanted the financial statements to reflect that the company broke even in 2006/07, but the auditors said they wouldn't make the adjustment because there was still an outstanding bill. At the time, he was mad because he thought the company had broken even, he said.

When Goring raised the issue at the Oct. 8 board of education meeting, Atkinson said he had a lengthy discussion with the auditor about the financial statements and was told that they had to perform the audit as it was presented, with the $36,000 profit shown last year and a loss shown the previous year.

"In terms of the business company, they're the ones who have to sign off as auditors," he said.

"I'm just telling you what happened. I'm not saying I agree or disagree with how it should be done."

Atkinson told The Record that he stands by the audited financial statements.

"If he (Goring) doesn't agree with them, maybe he should take up accounting," he said.

He also noted Goring asked at the business company's annual general meeting what it would cost for the business company to shut down.

"I think I pointed out to him that I've seen probably thousands of financial statements in my business career, and I've never seen one that had anything to do with the wind-up costs of a company," he said.

If Goring disagrees with the audited financial statements, Atkinson said he should talk to the auditors at Grant Thornton.

Atkinson noted that Goring is running as a school trustee and suggested he's looking for a political issue that will get his name in the paper.

"Why does he call a reporter, and you know what the answer to that is: it's election time.

"And so Voice and other people are interested ... in getting their name printed in the paper.

"(They) come up with what I would consider partial red-herrings like this, trying to build some sort of profile.

"But I wish they'd endeavour to build a positive profile instead of a negative profile," he said.

He also noted that Goring himself pointed out at the business company's general meeting that revenue had doubled in the last year.

"Even though he wishes to be negative about the modest return, and maybe he's somewhat disappointed or embarrassed by the company being in the black instead of in the red, which would give him more of a campaign platform, I suppose, the fact is the company is in the black," Atkinson said.

"The business company's broken even for the last two years, and it's trending in the right direction, and I perceive that to be positive."

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Top ten list of Voice positives

VOICE school trustee candidate, Shelley Waldie, and her husband, Brian, ran out of fingers while listing all of the positives VOICE New Westminster represents for them.

Shelley and Brian narrowed their list of positives down to 10 that they want to share. Here is their top ten list in reverse order:

10.... Voice represents positive change

9.... Voice seeks out and values public input

8.... Voice is committed to transparency, integrity and full disclosure

7.... All Voice members and candidates live in New Westminster (see #4)

6.... Voice members and candidates have a diversity of viewpoints (entrepreneurs alongside union members….)

5.... Voice has no baggage or affiliation to any political group

4.... Voice has representation and membership from all New Westminster neighbourhoods (Victory-Massey Heights, Moody Park/Uptown, Queensborough, Glenbrook North, Queens Park, Connaught Heights, Brow of the Hill, West End, McBride-Sapperton, Downtown and Quayside).

3.... Voice has diversity in terms of age, gender and ethnicity, household income….

2.... Voice has a mix of seasoned experience blended with fresh ideas, energy and enthusiasm

1.... And the number 1 thing that Voice brings to the table that no one else can: cooperation and collaboration between the city and the school district. With Voice this is a given: The next city council, mayor and school board are already meeting as a group.


Thanks, Shelley and Brian, for sharing your list with us.

Thursday, October 2, 2008

Air Quality Monitoring coming to Sapperton and 6th and Front Streets

On Monday, September 29th, I spoke at city hall and thanked City council for the support they had given the McBride Sapperton Residents’ Association’s request to Metro Vancouver for an air quality monitoring station in Sapperton.

Sapperton, and indeed all of New Westminster, has many issues impacting our air quality. We have certain industries in the Braid Industrial area that are allowed to discharge into the atmosphere and we have the diesel particulate from the many trains and traffic that traverses our fair City. As president of the association I have spoken at City Hall over the last many years about some of the other issues faced by Sappertonians. I have asked for E.8th Avenue, E. Columbia and Braid Streets to no longer be truck routes so that we don’t have diesel particulate being spewed through our neighbourhoods.

I’ve also tried to alert people to the implications of the additional traffic that will result from the province’s Gateway Project. Twinning the Port Mann bridge (which will make it that much more appealing for people to live in the sprawling communities south of the Fraser) will not ease traffic and pollution in our neighbourhoods. By encouraging people to live in communities where land is being removed from the Agricultural Land Reserve and then have them drive 30-40 kilometres to work will not help our air quality. We presently have the Port Mann operating as a natural traffic control valve into our communities. As we remove this valve we encourage people who have been carpooling or taking alternatives to get back into their cars and race across the new lanes of the Port Mann and then through our neighbourhood streets.

I’ve also spoken about our concerns regarding Metro Vancouver’s attempted expropriation of the Canfor lands and the increased truck traffic and emissions an incinerator would bring. Presently Metro Vancouver and Port Metro Vancouver are battling over ownership of this site. Either of these authorities will bring a serious increase in regional truck traffic to our city.

It was due to these concerns, and in particular the Canfor expropriation, that I wrote a letter on behalf of the McBride Sapperton Residents’ Association and asked the City and the Fraser Health Authority to back our request to Metro Vancouver to have an air monitoring station in Sapperton. I was very happy to hear that over the next year Metro Vancouver will be having an air monitoring station in the Sapperton Park area. When I spoke before council I was also delighted to hear that council had requested that some mobile testing be included. The data Metro Vancouver gathers on air pollutants, ozone, nitrogen oxides, sulphur dioxide, carbon monoxide and particulate matter can be used as a baseline for New Westminster to consider when approving any future developments in the area.

- Neil Powell

Friday, September 26, 2008

City may soon buy waterfront land

New Westminster News Leader - By Michael McQuillan

Published: September 26, 2008 2:00 PM
Updated: September 26, 2008 3:04 PM

The City of New Westminster is involved in closed-door meetings to buy the Westminster Pier from an Alberta investor group. The deal could be completed within a month.

The Westminster Pier is a seven-acre former dockside property located on the Fraser River, east of the Fraser River Discovery Centre and the Larco property parking lot. Acquiring the land would allow the city to continue its goal of reclaiming its waterfront for public access.

But the deal is in jeopardy, say some members of New Westminster council, now that details of the sale are public.

Voice New Westminster, which released the information Thursday, counters some council members' plan to use the announcement of the purchase to score political points with New Westminster electors, who go to the civic polls Nov. 15.

"If this is being trotted out as an election goody, there better be some substance to it," said Blair Armitage, the mayoralty candidate for the Voice slate.

"I'm sure (Mayor Wayne Wright) wouldn't comment about trotting this out as an election goody but the timing of everything is once again too coincidental," he said, referring to the mayor's 2005 announcement regarding the Plaza 88 development prior to the 2005 civic election.

"If they're going to do this again, let's have the substance behind it."

Voice learned about the sale when members of the civic electors group spoke to surveyors working at the site, said Armitage.

But Coun. Johnathan Cote accused Voice councillors Bob Osterman and Betty McIntosh of revealing information about the deal, which was discussed by council during an in-camera meeting.

"This release of information may compromise the city's ability to complete this incredibly important deal," said Cote.

Armitage came to the defence of the two Voice councillors, and explained that he asked Osterman about the land deal and was told he couldn't discuss it because of its confidential nature.

Mayor Wright refuted Armitage's claim that the land purchase was aimed at gaining votes.

"We've been really diligent in trying to get this for a waterfront park for some time. That part is public knowledge," Wright said. "We've been trying to get the waterfront back for over 30 years."

The land had been owned by the provincial government but was then sold to Westminster Pier Development Corp., which planned to build residential towers on the site. The land was then sold to the Alberta investment group when Westminster Pier Development Corp. ran into financial problems.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Business Company posts miraculous pre-election "profit"

At last night’s school board meeting, we finally got to see where the school district’s business company ended up financially at the end of June. Not surprisingly, the business company is claiming a miraculous pre-election profit of $36,649 for the year ending June 30th.

In light of last night’s announcement, it will be interesting to see the detailed financial information on the school district business company at their AGM next week. What I’m really curious to know is whether the accumulated interest on the $1 million borrowed from the school district by the business company will figure at all in their financial calculations. After all, there aren’t many places where you can borrow money for free. However, I doubt that any borrowing costs will be showing against the $36,649 being claimed as profit.

The other thing that needs to be taken into account is the fact that the business company’s CEO (Brent Atkinson) is working for free. In the real world a CEO position would represent a cost to the business company of at least $130,000 per year which means the business company really ended up last year with a minimum $100,000 loss.

It’s also important to keep in mind that when Brent Atkinson took over as CEO of the business company, on an emergency basis, it was intended to be a short term solution. It was recognised that there was an inherent conflict in having a school trustee serve as CEO. But Brent has now been in this CEO position for a considerable amount of time and it is therefore not unreasonable to expect that costs reflective of a CEO salary should be accounted for in the business company financials.

If my memory serves me correctly, the previous CEO of the business company (Russ Pacey) was being paid in the order of $120,000 per year as an Assistant Superintendent, of which 20% was being shown as a cost for the business company. Even at 20% of a $120,000 per year salary (and I believe the 20% figure is low), the previous cost of a CEO for the business company was a minimum of $24,000 per year.

So in my opinion, the profit being claimed for the business company is really just pre-election smoke and mirrors. The business company has not lived up to the promise held out to the community seven years ago that the venture would be financial boon to the school district and its students. In reality, it’s been a boondoggle and not a boon at all.
- Patrick O’Connor

Tuesday, September 23, 2008

Amenities, Variances and Density Bonusing

I attended the recent “downtown Charette” hosted by City staff. The City is currently updating the Official Community Plan for the Downtown neighbourhood and this exercise was designed to solicit community input. The staff involved were knowledgeable, respectful and approachable and “no idea was dismissed”. Attendees chose between four design groups. The group I participated in touched on issues such as replacing and/or including rental housing units, senior residential spaces, daycares and schools etc. in new developments. The community participants brought different ideas to the table and showed great vision. I really enjoyed the event and hope that some of the input will be considered in the planning process for Downtown development.

The area included as “Downtown” was essentially from the waterfront to Royal Avenue and from Albert Crescent and along the waterfront to the Krueger Paper site. Two major properties up for discussion were: (1) the property adjacent to the Degelder site on Carnarvon; and (2) the vacant lot previously known as St. Mary’s Hospital.

The height of the Degelder project has created permanent shadowing on surrounding properties. There is (at least) one highrise in the vicinity that I’m sure will never see direct sun again. One idea put forward that may work in spite of this shadowing problem was a mixed use/mixed density development in a style we referred to as the “Village at Carnarvon”. One thought was to include the Civic Centre on this site. The Civic Centre is being funded entirely (so far) by casino money. It has yet to be decided what will be incorporated into the facility, but we have been led to believe it will include a large art component.

The discussion for the old St. Mary’s site (owned by Bosa and currently listed for sale) was lively. I have always felt that any redevelopment on that property (that is not a new hospital) would have to have include a community amenity; one that would be accessible to all residents. Keeping in mind the pride this City has for its history, my thought would be to include a new museum.

The City currently has a museum at the back of Irving House. The building is completely unsatisfactory. In fact, the City-commissioned Cornerstone Report completed in June 2004 identified that there was risk to the collections, personnel and public from seismic deficiencies.

There have been discussions to include a museum in another building at the Quay, but the proximity to the water has been identified as an environmental condition that would be harmful to the collection. A museum on the St. Mary’s site could include a memorial to the hospital incorporating some of the tiles that had been saved from demolition - perhaps even recreating the garden. It would also compliment and support Irving House, an existing museum that cannot be moved to another area as the location is a large part of its historical value.

If a developer were to give the City adequate space for a museum (and perhaps even sponsor the entire museum) or a different amenity, concessions, likely in the form of variances, would need to be afforded. Bearing in mind this is a large parcel of property, the surrounding zonings and the fact that the developer needs to make a profit, is this something the community would be prepared to accept and if so, to what limits? One 20 storey highrise? Or 2 highrises? Higher or lower? More or less? Mixed density? Townhouses? Commercial? Mixed use? All of these ideas? What are your ideas for the site? Is trading variances (Density Bonusing) for amenities something that would be generally accepted city-wide?

Susan Wandell

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Director Paul Johansen's response to Michael Ewen's Letter to the editor

Dear Editor:

Re: It's time to move forward, The Record, Letters to the editor, Sept. 13.

With interest, I read school trustee Michael Ewen's letter on the land use study, but still, it does not explain why the district-commissioned Archie Miller report about the Douglas Road Cemetery was kept so secret.

According to a recent newspaper article, it was never acted on or shared with all trustees until this summer, years after it was issued by Mr. Miller. To commission, withhold and ignore consultant reports is not "best practice."

In fact, as a glaring example of how this board neglects to follow proper channels of process, it completely contradicts Mr. Ewen's claims about debate leading to consensus decisions at the board table.

This is further evidenced by the construction of school district parking lots.

In constructing the high school site parking lot, the board ignored the Archie Miller report that outlined the possibility that there were remains still buried on site and also ignored the requirement to secure permits for the construction of the parking lot.

Having knowledge of the lost graves, and bypassing city hall's permit process, the upper parking lot at the high school was constructed anyway.

At McBride Elementary School, another parking lot was also improperly constructed; as a result, damage was caused to neighbouring residential property. Because the construction was done without permits, the city ordered that the parking lot be removed and that the site be restored to its previous state.

For lack of a permit and because of faulty construction, at great financial expense, the McBride school parking lot was done and then undone with no benefit to anyone.

Consequently, the parking difficulties at McBride remain, and the money that was spent was completely wasted.

In this district, the board does not have sufficient capital funds to address its many facility issues.

This makes it completely unacceptable for the district to continually repeat "rookie" mistakes.

Not only is it bad management to bypass process and ignore expertise, it's arrogant. Ultimately, over and again, it is the students who are penalized by board incompetence.

That said, one outstanding question remains: will a fine be assessed and will a correction of the high school parking lot be ordered as well?

Paul Johansen, New Westminster

Tuesday, September 16, 2008

Voice is looking for volunteers, financial support, and most of all, your vote!!

The decision to run in a civic election can be a very daunting proposition to an unaligned or independant candidate. As an electors organization, going through the process of talking to people who have expressed interest, or talking to people the organization might have an interest in, you realize just how overwhelming the process really is to prospective candidates. There always will be independants, and that is the way it should be. However, Voice now gives an avenue for people to explore, to question, and to determine if the organization is a fit for them.
Voice is completing the final steps toward a full slate, and it certainly has been an invigorating process.
It is very clear that Voice is a neighborhood focused, issues driven breed of cat, and that it is an organization that has appealed to a vast range of individuals. In speaking to many of these good folks, it is clear that the issue of transparency and the prospect of being free of the clutches of special interests has caught the attention of many of them.
It is very gratifying that a great number of the members of the public agree with many of the tenets that Voice was founded on.
It is clear that this community is ready for change.
It is also clear that this community craves for leaders with vision, leaders who have integrity, and leaders who have the skillset and the competence to get this City and the School Board moving forward.
Voice provides that leadership, that vision, that integrity and that competence.
Voice is looking for volunteers, financial support, and most of all, your vote!!
Be a part of this great grass roots movement, join Voice, as it steers this community back on course.
Support those people who have made the brave decision to put their name forward, support them so that this city can once again be the leader that it's residents, businesses and taxpayers deserve.

Casey Cook

Friday, September 12, 2008

We can only shudder to imagine

Somewhere out there, in a parallel universe, there’s a parallel New Westminster where, the week before last, nearly 2000 high school students walked into a brand new high school. Their new high school isn’t laden with asbestos nor is it being held together with Bondo. It doesn’t leak when it rains or snows, and best of all – in this parallel New Westminster – an exhausted rat-catcher is now mercifully being sent off to a well-deserved retirement. The entire focus at this parallel universe high school is on learning, not dreading what’s going to happen next.

Unfortunately, none of the above is happening here in the New Westminster we live in and the week before last our high school students returned to the same critically wounded NWSS they inhabited last year and the year before that.

There’s no point elaborating here on what went wrong with the high school replacement project or the negative impacts the endless delays and screw ups have had on students, staff and parents alike: these have been well-chronicled elsewhere.

But now that our kids are all back at school, the big question on the mind of many parents and community members is surely going to be “WHEN” will the new high school project finally get underway?

As we wait to hear fresh news of where things stand with the project, and whether the summer months have brought any solid progress, we can only shudder to imagine what bizarre new obstacles could conceivably be thrown in the project’s path.

In the interim, I’ve prepared a brief report from the notes I took last June 27, 2008 at an information meeting organized by incoming DPAC Chair Margot Barton (click here to read my report). Doug Hibbins presented information directly to those of us in attendance and it was extremely helpful to hear the information firsthand. I’m certain that all those who were in attendance at the meeting were most appreciative.

- Patrick O'Connor

Monday, September 8, 2008

SCHOOL TRUSTEE LISA GRAHAM JOINS VOICE NEW WESTMINSTER

Voice New Westminster is pleased to announce that New Westminster School Trustee, Lisa Graham, has joined Voice New Westminster and that she will be part of the Voice slate of candidates seeking election to the New Westminster school board on November 15th.

Graham says she's had an interesting vantage point on New Westminster politics over the last two terms on the school board and this vantage point made it an easy decision to joinVoice New Westminster.

"Voice is a diverse group of very capable individuals who have an impressive track record of community service," Graham said. "Municipal politics is very different from provincial and federal politics; the ideal of municipal politics is the free vote, unencumbered by party-whips, party-lines, or special interests. That's the principle that should be reflected in all the decisions made at city hall and the school board."

Graham says Voice not only respects the principle of unencumbered "free-voting," it strongly endorses the principle. "Voice is a group that includes members of all political stripes, and members of no political stripes," Graham said. "I like that; it's cause for renewed optimism for New Westminster. This is a very good fit for me."

Voice New Westminster was formed nineteen months ago to support a broadly-based,non-partisan slate of candidates for mayor, council and school board. Voice will be announcing its complete slate of school board candidates very soon.

Voice director, Casey Cook , welcomed Lisa Graham to the electors organization by stating, " Lisa has shown extraordinary resolve in fighting, often single-handedly, to get issues out to the public and to education stakeholders. She has been a champion of the public's right to know. In that respect, she has set herself apart from other trustees. Voice has stated since it's inception that it endorses the principle of transparency in the decision making process."

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Voice Candidates will Represent Community

In the September 6th Record, M. Lovick claims that Bob Osterman and Betty McIntosh have joined a political party. Voice is not a political party but an elector's organization formed by concerned citizens of New Westminster. We come from various backgrounds. Some of us are, or have been, active members of various federal and provincial parties and some of us have not belonged to any party. Our purpose is to support candidates for Council and for School Board who put the common interests of our citizens before those of any special interest groups. We do not have "policy guidelines" for our candidates to follow. They will be free to vote their conscience when they are serving as elected representatives of the people of New Westminster. We do not "target" labour as many of our members, including some of our candidates, are members of unions. If one looks at the Labour Council supported candidates they usually vote as a block, and usually side with the Mayor. It is curious how these representatives of labour are so willing to do what the Mayor and his developer friends want. Zoning by Variance has become an all too common practice with those members of city council. As one who is active on my residents' association it is disheartening to see how the wishes of neighbourhoods are pushed aside by these councillors who claim to represent the working people of this city.

- Joan Davis

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Voluntary Recall of Sandwiches sold in New Westminster, Surrey and Langley

OTTAWA, August 30, 2008 - The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and King Bean Wholesalers are warning the public not to serve or consume certain King Bean Wholesalers sandwiches described below because these products may be contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes.

This recall is being initiated as these sandwiches contain a ready-to-eat deli meat product recalled by Maple Leaf Consumer Foods, Burlington, ON. There have been no reported illnesses associated with the consumption of these sandwiches.

The following King Bean Wholesalers sandwiches are affected by this alert:

Product

UPC

Best Before Dates up to and Incl.

Roast Beef Sandwich

6 26403 00103 3

01-Sep-08

Roast Beef Kaiser

6 26403 00878 0

01-Sep-08

Roast Beef and Sub

6 26403 00070 8

01-Sep-08

Roast Beef Sub 6 26403 00030 2 01-Sep-08

These sandwiches were sold in stores located in New Westminster, Surrey and Langley, British Columbia.

Food contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes may not look or smell spoiled. Consumption of food contaminated with this bacteria may cause listeriosis, a foodborne illness. Listeriosis can cause high fever, severe headache, neck stiffness and nausea. Pregnant women, the elderly and people with weakened immune systems are particularly at risk. Infected pregnant women may experience only a mild, flu-like illness, however, infections during pregnancy can lead to premature delivery, infection of the newborn, or even stillbirth.

King Bean Wholesalers, Surrey, BC, is voluntarily recalling the affected products from the marketplace. The CFIA is monitoring the effectiveness of the recall.

For more information, consumers and industry can call one of the CFIA at 1-800-442-2342 / TTY 1-800-465-7735 (8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. Eastern time, Monday to Friday).

For information on Listeria monocytogenes, visit the Food Facts web page at http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/fssa/concen/causee.shtml.

For information on receiving recalls by e-mail, or for other food safety facts, visit our web site at www.inspection.gc.ca

Taken from: http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/corpaffr/recarapp/2008/20080830e.shtml

Friday, August 29, 2008

Voice announced its complete slate of candidates for mayor and council

Voice issued a media release on Thursday, August 28th, 2008 announcing the list of those who will be representing Voice in the upcoming municipal election for the positions of mayor and council.

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Blair Armitage sets sights on becoming New Westminster mayor

The president of a new civic party in New Westminster may pull off what second-term Mayor Wayne Wright accomplished two previous municipal elections ago: unseating an incumbent.
In 2002, Wright, who had never been on council, narrowly defeated then-mayor Helen Sparkes.
Blair Armitage has never run for any civic office in New Westminster and is not identified with provincial political parties. This fall, the 64-year-old cofounder and president of the civic party Voice New Westminster wants to win Wright’s seat at City Hall. However, he has to first secure the endorsement of his party during its nominating convention on September 22.

In a phone interview with the Straight, Armitage identified three issues he wants to focus on. For one, he noted that development costs in the city are too low compared to other jurisdictions. Armitage also wants to reduce the high taxes that city residents have to pay because the city doesn’t collect enough from developers. He likewise expressed concern about safety and security.
“I believe that changes are in order, and that you can sit back and do nothing or you take a stand and attempt to do something, and that’s where I fall into,” Armitage, former general manager of the Quilchena Golf and Country Club, said of his decision to enter civic life.
Armitage—along with a group that included former four-term city councillor Casey Cook and long-time NDP member Steve McClurg—helped found Voice New Westminster in 2007.
Cook, who failed to unseat Wright in the 2005 election, isn’t planning to seek the party’s nomination either for mayor or a slot on its council slate. Cook told the Straight he may consider running for school board.
For his part, McClurg told the Straight that he will vie for a nomination as candidate for council.

By Carlito Pablo
From the Georgia Straight

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

The Pattullo Bridge – What To Do?

We have agreement!

Everyone agrees that the Pattullo Bridge, first opened in 1937, needs a very serious upgrade or needs to be replaced. Everyone agrees that it is going to be expensive. Everyone agrees it is needed now, not in 10 or 15 years. But this is about where the agreement ends.

TransLink’s Board of Directors has given staff the go-ahead to begin preliminary work toward building a new Pattullo Bridge that will be financed by tolls. The Board’s decision follows receipt of a consultant’s report (The Delcan Report) that concluded it was preferable to build an entirely new bridge rather than invest more money in the existing structure as one half of a twinned span.

The decision to finance the bridge through tolls raises questions about the province's tolling policy. Victoria had designated the Pattullo as the untolled alternative to the tolled and twinned Port Mann Bridge that is to be built by 2013. If the Pattullo, Port Mann and Golden Ears bridges all end up tolled as is now planned, motorists seeking a free crossing might be forced as far south as the Alex Fraser Bridge. (But is this a legitimate concern?)

Enter the politicians.

From the NDP we have Delta North MLA, Guy Gentner, Surrey-Newton MLA, Harry Bains, NDP MLA and transportation opposition critic, Maurine Karagianis all lined up against the introduction of tolls to finance this project. Among a variety of concerns they believe that the introduction of tolls will force many drivers to the Alex Fraser causing even greater congestion.

Minister of Transportation, Kevin Falcon, always sensitive to his critics, pointed out that the $1-billion South Fraser perimeter road that recently received environmental approval will allow drivers to get from the Pattullo to the Alex Fraser in five minutes, drastically cutting down on congestion. He also said not all drivers will be flocking to the Alex Fraser because it is a free alternative. "A modest toll does not act as a big dissuasion for people to make a travel decision. At least that's what all the traffic studies tell us.”

"When you do the traffic modelling, what you find - and the Port Mann is the best example - is that today when people are spending 4½ hours sitting on a bridge, wasting time, if they have the option of paying a few dollars to get across it a lot faster, people will do that."

New Westminster City Councillor, Bill Harper is also against the toll. "They are tolling the new Golden Ears Bridge, they're going to toll the (new) Port Mann and now the new Pattullo," Harper said. "Most of the bridges going across the Fraser are going to be tolled."

Harper said high gas prices are already negatively affecting drivers, and he wondered how fair it is to charge tolls for people who have to drive across the bridge when they have no choice.

"Health-care services have been regionalized, so you have people from Surrey coming to Royal Columbian Hospital and people from New Westminster and Burnaby going to Surrey," Harper explained. "What choice do these people have but to go back and forth on a toll bridge?"

TransLink's spokesperson, Ken Hardie said that on the subject of tolls TransLink has no other option. "It's the only way we can pay for it," Hardie said. "TransLink basically doesn't have $800 million to build it in our budget. In fact, we are short lots of money." Therefore the decision has been made and it is that the new Pattullo Bridge will have tolls!

Voice New Westminster Director, Neil Powell, captures the sentiments of a number of New Westminster residents. “All bridges in the lower mainland should be tolled. Look at the original tenets of the Livable Region Strategic Plan.”

1) Protect the green zone
2) Build complete communities
3) Achieve a compact metropolitan region; and
4) Increase transportation choices.

Powell suggests that a greater Vancouver region-wide toll system should be considered. The technology exists to have variable rate tolls at different times of the day across an entire system. Congestion pricing such as this could be an effective tool in getting the most out of the Lower Mainland’s bridge and highway system and it would generate funding for capital expenditures. For example, transit options that are realistic alternatives to driving a car.

So where do you put the new bridge?

The Delcan report suggests TransLink could build the new bridge 50 metres upstream or 50 metres downstream. Making that decision will involve looking at the costs and impacts of each option on the areas on both sides of the river.

Another school of thought advanced by Voice New Westminster Director Patrick O’Connor, would be to include the bridge with the construction of the “Stormont Connector”. The Stormont connector project would join the Pattullo Bridge to Highway 1. The project could be done as a massive cut and cover operation that would put the entire route, from the bridgehead to Highway 1 underground and then restore McBride Blvd to a local surface road with enhanced pedestrian connections between the two sides of McBride. This project has been in discussion for years.

What happened to all of the previous plans for Marine Way in Burnaby? According to the plans that have been on the books for many years, Marine Way traffic was supposed to be served by a Tree Island Bridge which has never been built. The Tree Island Bridge was supposed to route Alex Fraser Bridge traffic away from the Queensborough Bridge and directly onto Marine Way.

The Tree Island Bridge route would also have lined truck traffic up with the Byrne Road connector which would then direct the truck traffic along New Westminster’s northern boundary. This is where the Stormont connector project would have come in. The Tree Island Bridge route was supposed to connect with the Stormont Connector and then directly onto Highway 1.

A truck route like that might even have eliminated the need for a North Fraser Perimeter Road as a way to get from various points west along the Fraser to Highway 1. New West planners have even talked about a tunnel for trucks and rail that would start near New Westminster’s western border and then pop out at our Eastern border near Highway 1. Something like that would cost billions but would eliminate a lot of truck traffic in New Westminster, and lead to a lot less rail infrastructure along our waterfront.

TransLink CEO, Tom Prendergast said the next stages for replacing the Pattullo Bridge will involve making some fundamental decisions, including where the new bridge will go, which road network improvements will be needed and whether a new rail crossing will be integrated into the new structure. As well, he said TransLink will want to ensure that the new bridge will integrate effectively with the road network, so we will want to consider how the North and South Fraser Perimeter Roads will be developed.

TransLink's spokesperson, Ken Hardie said the transportation authority is aware of the current bottlenecks in New Westminster and how a new and wider bridge will impact the city. He said TransLink would look at how to mitigate the situation once a final decision is made on where to locate the bridge.

Next steps

It is imperative that everyone who has an interest in the future of New Westminster review a detailed copy of the Delcan Report. An executive summary is available on line. Follow the links below.

The traffic modeling studies need to be reviewed. The impact studies (economic, social and environmental) need to be reviewed. A solid position on the future of this City must be articulated. Once this is done we must get out in front of getting this project moving. 10 years is not a long time but it is an eternity when you consider what we are experiencing today with the traffic.

Delcan Report

Blair Armitage

Aldergrove Pool Process vs. Kiwanis Pool "Process"

After all of the bleating from Cote, Harper, Williams and the group pushing for the pool plans that will be built in Moody Park, now the foolishness of that decision becomes even more clear.

A friend of mine, who is in the pool business with a major player in the Lower Mainland, sent me the reports of a process engaged in by the Township of Langley. The process was engaged by the Township to determine the best course of action to replace/enhance aging recreation and aquatic facilities in Aldergrove.

The process was engaged in at the same time the Moody Park process was done, so the prices structure the two communities faced for building their facilities were roughly the same.

The consultation process engaged in for the Aldergrove facilities was transparent, respectful and empowering to those who participated.

Compare that to the shabby, often secret and mickey mouse process undertaken in New Westminster. The Moody Park community, simply, was never clear on the process, the criteria used in the decision, in what could best be described as a "make up the rules as you go process".

We make the Langley Township report available for your viewing, because the report itself can say it much better than I can.

Read the report, draw your own conclusions.

In the Township report, look at the clarity in defining the discussion, and the options available to help the decision making.

Now review the whole process in New Westminster, from the discussion of spending money to extend the life of the old poll, the decision to deconstruct the old pool, the lack of process and lack of any meaningful attempt to build concensus on how to move forward, to the decision to hire a management company which had never built an outdoor pool.

It is clear to me, that once again, the squandering of scarce public money in New Westminster is out of control.

In the decision making process for the Moody Park Pool , Voice New Westminster tried to do the right thing, and asked the politicians to review their decision.

It made little difference. The politically motivated incompetents ruled the day.

Once again, lack of leadership, coupled with special interest politics has done serious harm to this city.

Read the reports, I think you'll agree.

C.C.


Thursday, July 31, 2008

Where has Wayne Wright been on this issue?

In a piece of expert photography done exclusively for Voice New Westminster, we are able to graphically show visitors to this site the deterioration that has occurred to a portion of the Skytrain bridge situated above Front St. in New Westminster. With the chunks of fallen concrete that have been recovered by people in the area, and corroborated by our pictures, it is very clear that there is a significant safety issue for workers in the area, as well as for vehicles and pedestrians traveling through the area.

Voice New Westminster also feels that the public must have assurance and confidence regarding the safety of passenger movement on the bridge. We call on TransLink to send in an independent team of structural engineers to inspect the bridge.

Mayor Wayne Wright's response to the situation, frankly, puzzles Voice New Westminster. His tying in of the Pattullo Bridge and North Fraser Perimeter Road to the Skytrain Bridge situation is consistent with his erratic voting record on regional transportation issues.

The Skytrain Bridge issue is very different from the other two, a fact that the Mayor should know full well, given that he was a director of the Greater Vancouver Transit Authority (GVTA) and Skytrain for most of his 5 1/2 years on council. The Mayor was on the board of the body responsible for Skytrain and it's maintenance.

His attempt to shift the blame is consistent also with the lack of knowledge on transportation issues that he has displayed. New Westminster's transportation needs have been poorly served by this Mayor's pandering to special interests in order to enhance his own political position.

Check out the Voice website for some up-close pictures of the damage.

C.C.